Buyer's guide

How to choose an AI visibility platform: setup, citation evidence and CRM attribution compared

For mid-market B2B SaaS marketing, demand generation and RevOps teams picking one reporting layer for AI search. Five criteria, how five platforms differ on each, and where we fit. We make Targetlytics, so check our column hardest.

The short answer

  • No platform here does everything with no setup. Monitoring tools (Otterly, Peec AI) show results the same day because they only need a list of questions. Linking AI visits to pipeline needs a script on your site and a CRM connection, whichever vendor you choose.
  • Already run marketing in HubSpot and only need a visibility score next to your campaigns? Start with HubSpot AEO. Need SSO, SOC 2 and a procurement-friendly contract? Profound. Want cheap, quick monitoring? Otterly. Want clean daily reports and a Looker Studio feed? Peec AI.
  • Need the visibility report, the pages AI cites, and the companies AI sends you written into HubSpot in one product: Targetlytics. HubSpot is our only live CRM; Salesforce is not supported.
  • Competitor details come from each vendor's own pricing and documentation pages, checked on 31 October 2026. Plans change often.

Why this decision matters for mid-market SaaS

B2B buyers now ask AI assistants to shortlist vendors before they talk to sales. 6sense's 2025 Buyer Experience Report found that 94% of B2B buyers use AI chat tools during a purchase, and over half use them to compare vendors.

That leaves two questions for a mid-market team. Does AI name us when buyers ask, and which pages does it trust? And are the buyers it sends turning into pipeline? Most tools answer the first. Fewer answer the second, and that difference decides how much setup you take on.

The five criteria that separate these platforms

  • Assistants covered: which AI assistants are checked, on which plan, and how many times each question is asked. One run per question is mostly luck.
  • Citation evidence: whether you can see the exact answer, the competitors it named, and the pages it read before answering.
  • CRM connection: whether the tool writes anything into your CRM itself, or leaves you to move data with exports, an API or a connector you build.
  • Pipeline attribution: whether a visit from an AI assistant can be tied to a company, then to open and won deals.
  • Setup and upkeep: what you must install, who has to approve it, and how long until the first useful result.

Setup effort: what each platform asks of your team

Monitoring needs no code. You add your brand, competitors and buyer questions, and the vendor asks AI assistants for you. Otterly, Peec AI and Targetlytics all work this way; the first Targetlytics report arrives in about two hours after starting the free audit. HubSpot AEO sits inside Marketing Hub, so there is no extra tool to connect. Profound starts with a trial and moves to a custom contract through its sales team.

Pipeline attribution takes more. With Targetlytics it is one tracking script on your site (no build step) plus the HubSpot app. Write access to HubSpot is optional at install, and pushing companies is off until you switch it on per brand. Qualified companies are pushed daily at 05:30 UTC, and their deals are read back every Monday. For EU and UK sites, install the script with consent required, so legal review has a clear answer.

Citation evidence: what you can check yourself

All five platforms show which pages AI cites. The differences are in depth and in what happens next. Profound and Peec AI report the searches AI runs before answering (query fan-out); Targetlytics shows those searches for ChatGPT and Claude and the sources for every assistant on paid plans. Targetlytics and Peec AI check answers against facts you set and flag wrong claims; Profound calls this FactCheck.

Ask any vendor to open one number and show the answers behind it. In Targetlytics every number opens to the answers and sources it came from, and you can re-run the question yourself.

CRM-connected pipeline attribution: who does it natively

This is where the platforms differ most. HubSpot AEO is inside your CRM but does not identify the companies AI sends to your site. Otterly, Peec AI and Profound do not state on their sites that they write AI-referred companies into a CRM; their data leaves through exports, APIs, MCP or BI connectors, so the bridge to deals is yours to build.

Targetlytics writes AI fields onto HubSpot company records: the assistant that sent them, buying intent, the question topic, and the page they landed on. It never creates or edits deals. Your reps create deals as usual, and the weekly sync reads open and won deal totals back for each company it pushed. It identifies companies, not people, from business networks; on B2B traffic we expect roughly 10 to 25% of AI visits to resolve to a company.

Limits worth knowing before you buy: HubSpot is the only live CRM (Pipedrive, Attio and Zoho are coming; Salesforce is not on our integration list), the deal amount stays with the company rather than being split across touches, and company identification is on the Ultimate and Agency plans.

How the HubSpot fields and schedules workHubSpot setup docs

Reporting for leadership

Executives usually want two numbers: how often AI recommends us against named competitors, and what pipeline came from AI. Where those numbers live matters more than how the chart looks.

HubSpot AEO puts its score next to your campaign data. Peec AI (from Advanced), Otterly and Profound feed Looker Studio, and Profound also feeds Tableau. Targetlytics keeps visibility in its dashboard and puts pipeline where finance already looks: filter HubSpot companies on "AI assistant that sent them" and report deals from there. Slack alerts are available, a read-only API and MCP connector come on every plan, and agencies get white-label PDF and CSV reports.

When to choose each platform

  • HubSpot AEO: you are on Marketing Hub Pro or Enterprise, you need a directional score on ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, and you do not need to know which companies AI sent you.
  • Otterly: a small team, a short list of questions, a low bill, and no CRM work this year.
  • Peec AI: you want daily runs, easy reports, a Looker Studio feed and a SOC 2 Type II report, and you can bridge to the CRM yourself.
  • Profound: you are a large organisation with procurement, SSO and SOC 2 requirements and an analyst team to act on the data.
  • Targetlytics: you want twelve assistants, a weekly to-do list, and AI-referred companies written into HubSpot so pipeline can be reported without a separate attribution tool. Not a fit if you are Salesforce-only or need a SOC 2 report today.

What we found running it on ourselves

We ran five buyer questions about our own category through Targetlytics. AI named us in none of them, and the answers cited five sites, mostly tool home pages. That result is why this guide exists. The full numbers are on our B2B SaaS page; we will add the re-measured result there whether it moved or not.

AI visibility for B2B SaaS and technology companies

How we wrote this

We make Targetlytics, so read this as a vendor's view. Details about other products come from their own pricing, feature and documentation pages, checked on 31 October 2026. Where a vendor's site says nothing about a capability, we write "Not stated on its site" rather than "No". We did not run all five products on the same questions. Setup times for other vendors are not published consistently, so we describe what each asks of you instead of quoting minutes. If something here is out of date, contact us and we will fix it.

Targetlytics vs HubSpotTargetlytics vs OtterlyTargetlytics vs Peec AITargetlytics vs Profound

How the leading AI visibility platforms differ for mid-market SaaS

Alphabetical, Targetlytics last. Checked on 31 October 2026 against each vendor's own pages. Scroll sideways on a phone.

PlatformSetup before a first resultCitation evidenceCRM and pipelineLeadership reportingStarting priceFits
HubSpot AEOInside Marketing Hub; nothing extra to connectPages AI cites and competitors named; ChatGPT, Gemini, PerplexityIt is the CRM; identifying AI-referred companies not offeredScore next to HubSpot campaign dataIncluded in Marketing Hub Pro/Enterprise, or standaloneTeams already standardised on HubSpot
Otterly.AIAdd questions; no site code for monitoringPages AI cites; query fan-out; 4 assistants included, more as add-onsCRM hand-off not stated on its site; API and MCP on higher plansLooker Studio connectorFrom $29 a monthSmall teams monitoring on a budget
Peec AIAdd questions; pick 3 of 6 engines on Starter to AdvancedSources, query fan-out, fact checks against your factsCRM hand-off not stated on its site; CSV and MCP every plan, API from ProDaily reports; Looker Studio from AdvancedFrom $95 a monthTeams wanting clean daily reports and SOC 2
ProfoundTrial, then custom enterprise contractCitation analysis, query fan-out, FactCheck, up to 9 engines on EnterpriseAggregate AI conversions; company identification not stated; API on EnterpriseLooker and Tableau; dedicated supportCustomLarge organisations with procurement and SOC 2 needs
TargetlyticsFree audit report in about 2 hours, no code; pipeline needs one script and the HubSpot appEvery answer and its sources; searches ChatGPT and Claude run; fact checks; 12 assistants asked many timesNamed companies written to HubSpot daily; open and won deals read back weekly (Ultimate, Agency); no SalesforceDashboard with every number traceable; HubSpot fields for pipeline reports; Slack; read-only API and MCPFree plan; paid from €49 a month; pipeline from €299 (Ultimate)Teams that need visibility and AI-sourced pipeline in HubSpot

A two-week evaluation checklist for any vendor

  1. Write ten real buyer questions

    Take them from won deals and sales calls, not from the vendor's suggestions. Run the same ten in every tool you trial.

  2. Ask for the exact assistant list and run count

    Which assistants on which plan, and how many times each question is asked. Ask to see how much the answers varied.

  3. Open one number to its evidence

    Pick any score and ask to see the answers, competitors named and pages cited behind it.

  4. Test the CRM path in a sandbox

    Connect a HubSpot test portal. Note every step that needs an export, an API script or a third-party connector, and add that time to your plan.

  5. Ask what is identified, and under what consent

    Companies or people, how unmatched visits are handled, and how the script behaves in the EU and UK. Get the answer in writing for legal review.

  6. Ask for the limits

    A good vendor names what its product cannot do. Ours are listed on every feature page.

See your own numbers before you compare

The free audit runs your buyer questions through AI assistants and shows which competitors are named instead of you. No card needed.

Get a free audit

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently asked questions

Citation tracking shows which AI assistants name you and which pages they read. Pipeline attribution links visits from those assistants to companies and then to deals in your CRM. The first answers "does AI mention us?"; the second answers "what pipeline came from it?"

Yes, if the platform writes AI-referred companies into your CRM. Targetlytics does this for HubSpot: it sets AI fields on the company record and reads open and won deals back weekly, so you report pipeline in HubSpot. With monitoring-only tools you need your own bridge from exports or an API.

For monitoring only, any of these needs no code: you add questions and get results the same day. For pipeline attribution, expect one script on your site and a CRM connection. Count the approvals (security, legal, CRM admin) as part of the setup time.

The one whose numbers already live where leadership looks. On HubSpot, HubSpot AEO or Targetlytics fields keep it in your CRM reports. On Looker Studio, Peec AI, Otterly or Profound feed it directly. Targetlytics' free audit gives a first report in about two hours.

No. HubSpot is the only live CRM. Pipedrive, Attio and Zoho are coming. If you are Salesforce-only, a monitoring tool plus your own bridge is the honest option today.

No. Each platform here has its own dashboard. You need a BI tool only if you want to blend AI visibility with other revenue data; Peec AI, Otterly and Profound feed Looker Studio, and Targetlytics has a read-only API and MCP connector.

Yes. A common setup is HubSpot as the CRM with Targetlytics feeding it. Avoid two tools writing AI attribution into the same CRM fields, or the numbers will conflict.

Free AI visibility audit

Find out what ChatGPT tells your buyers about you.

Where you're named, what AI gets wrong, and the first three things to fix. Emailed within two hours.

  • Within 2 hours
  • No credit card needed
  • Free
Prefer to talk? Book a 30-minute call
  1. Your site
  2. Your market

We'll send your report to this address